“๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น?” [CR#383]

CR ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ | ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ #๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿด๐Ÿฏ

Last week, I asked a room full of CIOs, CISOs, and Internal Auditors one question:

“๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น?”

Nobody had an answer.

That’s interesting because organizations constantly add new controls.

New policies.

New tools.

New approval workflows.

New monitoring solutions.

New compliance requirements.

But very few ever stop to ask:

“๐——๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ?”

Over time, security programs accumulate what I call ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜.

It’s similar to technical debt, but harder to detect.

Examples include:

  • Controls implemented for systems that no longer exist
  • Approval workflows that add delays without reducing risk
  • Reports that nobody reads
  • Manual reviews duplicated by automation
  • Legacy security tools that overlap with newer platforms
  • Policies that employees no longer understand because they’ve been amended dozens of times

Every unnecessary control consumes something valuable:

  • Time
  • Budget
  • Attention
  • Resources
  • Trust

And here’s the hidden costโ€ฆ

When employees are overwhelmed by too many low-value controls, they become less attentive to the controls that truly matter.

Complexity becomes the enemy of security.

One exercise every governance team should perform annually:

Create a list of your top 50 security controls.

Then ask five questions:

โœ”๏ธ What risk does this control reduce?
โœ”๏ธ Is that risk still relevant?
โœ”๏ธ Is another control already addressing it?
โœ”๏ธ Can it be automated or simplified?
โœ”๏ธ If we removed it tomorrow, would our risk materially increase?

If the answer to the last question is “No,” it’s time to rethink the control.

Cybersecurity maturity isn’t measured by the number of controls you implement.

It’s measured by the effectiveness of the controls you choose to keep.

The strongest security programs aren’t always the biggest.

They’re often the simplest.

Because every control should earn its place.

Not just inherit it.

๐Ÿ“ฉ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—š๐—ฅ๐—– ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐˜†๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐˜€, ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ข ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ด๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€?

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ “๐—›๐—ถ” ๐˜๐—ผ +๐Ÿต๐Ÿญ-๐Ÿต๐Ÿต๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿด๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ.

AuditSecIntelligence #CISORADAR #AITA #AITSS #AICSA #AIAL #AITL #CyberAudit #wdtd #CloudSecurity #AiSecX #DataGovernance #CloudCSF #pciai #AiAudit #AIGRC #AIGP #SaaS #Compliance #ZeroTrust #AuditTips #OperationalResilience #SuccessSAVER #FDE

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top